Connect with us

Renewable Energy Times

Innolith launches inflammable battery with 50,000 charging cycles

Solar

Innolith launches inflammable battery with 50,000 charging cycles



Inorganic electrolytes will do the trick the company says. For multi-MW grid-scale applications the company says its technology can boost battery life to 50,000 cycles and is inflammable. It adds that the costs of the product are competitive with conventional battery systems. Innolith is taking over the baton from Alevo, including chief executive and engineers. Alevo, however, went bankrupt last year, making the same promises.

Innovative battery technology provider Innolith AG announced the commercial launch of its inorganic electrolyte technology to improve lithium-ion batteries for grid-scale storage applications.

According to the company, the use of the new type of electrolyte allows mitigating the inherent limitations lithium-ion batteries have. Reportedly, the new battery electrolyte allows up to 50,000 charging cycles and eliminates flammability. This longevity would effectively reduce the costs per charging cycle, making it a more attractive solution for cycle intensive applications, such as grid storage systems providing frequency response.

At this first stage, Innolith says it will start commercial production of the batteries at an undisclosed location and with an undisclosed manufacturer. At the inquiry of pv magazine, Innolith board chairman Alan Greenshields said he could not disclose which company has secured the manufacturing deal, but “it is a very well established and known company as we are looking to work with strong experts.”

Innolith runs a site with 60 employees in Bruchsal, Germany, where chemists and engineers develop the technology. At this location, it performs basic cell research and development, battery management and cooling, as well as providing engineering support for the manufacturer and manufacturing process validation.

Innolith will supply its electrolyte to the undisclosed battery manufacturer, which will in turn produce the batteries. Greenshields highlights that through this partnership, the companies will be closely tied and that this is not just a supply deal.

When asked if the technology could be supplied to any manufacturer for integration into their lithium-ion batteries, he said that “the new electrolyte requires a different battery design. The higher conductivity means that the cells require electrodes that are ten times as thick. So, the modern flat layouts of lithium batteries are not applicable to the new electrolytes.”

He does, however, say that the existing architecture for Nickel-metal-hydrate (NiMH) batteries would be suitable for the technology. In the medium-term, Innolith aims to provide licenses and the electrolytes to manufacturers which are willing to produce with the new type.

Just the right chemistry

Greenshields further explained that the electrolyte is non-reactive, which addresses the issued chemical decomposition intrinsic to lithium-ion batteries. Conventional electrolytes react with the materials of the anode and other components inside the battery cells, causing a chemical reaction, which leaves the materials with a lower capability to perform.

According to Innolith this non-reactive property allows the battery to maintain its capacity through 50,000 charging cycles. It says this is 10 times higher than for conventional lithium-ion batteries.

Furthermore, the new material renders lithium batteries effectively inflammable, addressing a persistent issue in the technology. Greenshields says the problem initially occurred through a design flaw by Sony, which brought lithium-ion batteries to the market.

By his account, Sony addressed the issue with battery management systems, which would prevent overcharging and other causes for overheating. This works fine for consumer electronics, but has been a headache when batteries increased in capacity for EV’s and grid-scale storage, he says.

Greenshields touts that the technology reflects the company’s philosophy to fix issues on a chemical level, rather than continuing to work with flawed chemistry and build complicated systems around it to make it work.

Lower costs through more cycles

For now, the batteries will be used in grid-scale applications only, though Greenshields said that R&D processes are ongoing to bring the electrolyte into EV and residential storage applications. No more details could be shared, however.

When asked what the per kW/h costs of the battery are, Greenshields responded that “cost per kW/h as a metric made sense for smaller batteries in the past. However, with grid storage for frequency response, the cost of a battery should be determined in cost per cycle.”

According to him, grid storage batteries would run through around two cycles per day, which gives batteries with a higher maximum cycle count an advantage – financially and from a sustainability perspective. Following up on that point, Greenshields was asked whether higher upfront investment costs might not prevent investors from buying into the technology, as return on investment (ROI) periods could exceed current standard investment practices. He responded that “our batteries have a shorter payback period and also win on that metric.”

The company’s board chairman adds that the batteries could have an operative life-cycle of 15 years. This would be higher than with conventional lithium-ion batteries. Already, there would be “many companies inside the U.S., but also many outside the U.S. that have expressed interest in the new batteries,” he says. Though, he could not further specify which companies have expressed interest, or in which countries or continents these would be located in.

New game – new luck

The new inorganic electrolyte is in fact not a new technology. Alan Greenshields was already involved in fortu Powercell GmbH, a company working on inorganic electrolytes of that type, which was founded in 1997. Greenshields said that the company set out to produce a battery that is safe to use, meaning inflammable, and is highly durable.

“With Innolith, we have finally achieved what we set out to do,” he states. As fortu could not do it, the company was acquired by Alevo Group SA, in 2014. Alevo took over the patents and continued work on the electrolyte. However, in attempting to make the jump from small-scale production for trial purposes in Germany, to large-scale commercial production in the United States, the company burned through its financial assets – at tax benefits it received in the US – and ultimately reported insolvency.

In the following Chapter 11 consolidation, assets such as the manufacturing site, were sold off for a fraction of the costs and are no longer at the disposal of Alevo, or Innolith. The latter managed to secure IP rights to the electrolyte technology and Greenshields, again involved in the third company, has a chance to give the technology another try.

Speaking about the likelihood of success on the third attempt, Greenshields responded swiftly that, “Rudolf Diesel never sold a Diesel engine.” According to him, new technologies need time to reach commercial maturity and the right strategy. With fortu and Alevo this was not the case, but learning from the past Innolith would be in a better position to bring the product to the market.

“Other than before, we are counting on an experienced manufacturing partner to manage the upscaling of the production for us. The technology and R&D will remain our core focus, as this is our main competence,” says Greenshields

With regards to the company’s major stakeholder Dmitry Rybolovlev, who is on the section 241 report list of foreign nationals to be sanctioned, issued by the U.S. Treasury Department, Greenfields refused to provide information. “Innolith is allowed to do business everywhere in the world, and I cannot give information on our shareholder structure.”

He adds that such incidences show the importance of spreading manufacturing across the world, to avoid being at the will of politics. In this vein, he disclosed that the manufacturing site would be located in Europe, as close as possible to the R&D site in Bruchsal in Germany, to allow for seamless communication between R&D and manufacturing engineers. “We would produce in the U.S. if we found a positive business case to do so” he concluded.



Source PV Magazine

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in Solar

Categories

October 2018
M T W T F S S
« Sep    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Follow

Subscribe to notifications
To Top
%d bloggers like this: